On 01/18/2017 08:52 AM, Leonardo Sandoval wrote: > + Jose Lamego > > > Jose is doing recent work on the patchwork UI, perhaps there are already > bugs for the items you are asking. > > > On 01/18/2017 02:40 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: >> This looks great, thanks. >> >> On 17 January 2017 at 20:05, Paul Eggleton >> <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com <mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com>> >> wrote: >> >> In any event we are now finally in the >> position where our patchwork instance can be relied upon to >> collect emails, >> and the UI is much improved. This should give us a bit more >> visibility into >> where patches are at in the process, although we are still working >> on a few >> places where patch series status needs to be updated (e.g. when a >> patch goes >> into testing). >> >> >> What's the plan for these status updates -- is the idea that you go to >> patchwork UI to see the state of a specific patch set? >> Or maybe a reply to either patch sender or even the ML? >> There is a request to enable email notifications to submitter for patch status changes in the future: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7684
The idea is that users should have the option to use what they prefer: either the email notifications, or the patchwork web interface. >> On top of patchwork we have built a simple smoke-testing framework >> called >> "patchtest" [5] along with a suite of corresponding tests for OE >> [6]. These >> tests are fairly simplistic at this point but check the basics >> such as whether >> a patch has been properly signed off, etc. We should soon start >> seeing replies >> sent to the mailing list and to submitters with results if there >> are any >> failures, saving us from noticing and pointing out some of the >> more obvious >> classes of mistakes. >> >> >> Is there a reason for patchwork only showing "success" or "failure" >> in the web ui, instead of linking to test results at least in in the >> failure case? > > Jussi, that is a good idea. Right now we need to click into the series, > then into the patches and then one can see the patch test results, > obviously, not the best way. > >> >> >> >> - Jussi >> >> -- Jose Lamego | OTC Embedded Platforms & Tools | GDC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core