> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Robert Yang
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 3:14 PM
> To: Stefano Babic; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 5/5] file: 5.29 -> 5.30
>
> Yes, file's upstream commit ID has changed, Paul has sent a patch for it:
>
> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2017-
> March/134261.html
>

Is it better to use nobranch=1 ?
Changes in this file.git has broken Morty as well, we used nobranch=1 to 
resolve this issue.
I haven't tested this for other released versions of Yocto.

Thanks
Manju

> // Robert
>
> On 03/20/2017 05:14 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > On 22/02/2017 02:44, Robert Yang wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com>
> >> ---
> >>  meta/recipes-devtools/file/{file_5.29.bb => file_5.30.bb} | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>  rename meta/recipes-devtools/file/{file_5.29.bb => file_5.30.bb} (96%)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.29.bb b/meta/recipes-
> devtools/file/file_5.30.bb
> >> similarity index 96%
> >> rename from meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.29.bb
> >> rename to meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.30.bb
> >> index 29af8748150..0998fcfa899 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.29.bb
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/file/file_5.30.bb
> >> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ SRC_URI = "git://github.com/file/file.git \
> >>          file://0001-Add-P-prompt-into-Usage-info.patch \
> >>          "
> >>
> >> -SRCREV = "015b0cdce1a0abb68ab99510e7fc8d2f77e8ec77"
> >> +SRCREV = "79814950aafb81ecd6a910c2a8a3b8ec12f3e4a6"
> >>  S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> >>
> >>  inherit autotools
> >>
> >
> > Strange enough, it seems that the tree loses the history and all SRCREV
> > are wrong. I tried with -krogoth, -morty, -master, and no revision
> > number is found. In fact, after cloning the tree I see that all revision
> > number were changed, just a couple here:
> >
> > 5.25 is now : 789cfc7d727cee1c7cfb7d29c09162e2399285c5
> >
> > 5.30 (this patch) : 3050419355566d2a96c5be97fef0ffae097bbb96
> >
> > Ok, I fix this in my layer with a .bbappend, but...Of course, all builds
> > are broken - have you seen the same effect ?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Stefano
> >
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named 
recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, 
privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. 
Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to