ping,
Le 06/04/2017 à 14:20, Romain Perier a écrit : > Hello, > > > Le 06/04/2017 à 13:38, Richard Purdie a écrit : >> On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 17:05 +0200, Romain Perier wrote: >>> This commit updates the recipe to the last upstream tag. Then, as the >>> tarball no longer contains the pre-generated Makefile, inherit from >>> autotools >>> >>> [...] >>> -PACKAGECONFIG ?= "${@bb.utils.filter('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'acl >>> selinux', d)}" >>> +PACKAGECONFIG ?= "\ >>> + ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'acl', 'acl', '', d)} \ >>> + ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'selinux', 'selinux', >>> '', d)} \ >>> +" > Correct, I probably did something wrong during rebase. > >> I'm not sure the above should be there, it reverts someone else's >> change? >> >> I am a little nervous of taking this at this point in the release >> too... > What do you think if we backport the systemd service and the systemd > timer from upstream into 3.9.1 and then add support for systemd in the > recipe ? (In the original patches, I have written systemd services > myself) The code of logrotate would be unchanged. > > Regards, > Romain What do we do for this ? this is possible or I have to propose this feature for master-next ? (I mean post 2.3) Thanks, Romain -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core