On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 07:50 +1030, Graham Gower wrote:
> 2009/11/18 Sebastian Spaeth <[email protected]>:
> > additional: as this is an opkg issue, I am using opkg-native r240.
> >
> > Graham, is this supposed to work?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Spaetz
> >
>
> A quick look at the relevant code for this indicates to me that it may
> work under certain circumstances. Its non trivial to determine how
> this all interacts from code inspection alone. I'll play with it for a
> bit and let you know what I come up with.
It's meant to be handled by this chunk of code, and I'm fairly sure that
this used to work reliably. Has that part of opkg changed recently?
/* user request overrides package recommendation */
if (satisfying_pkg != NULL
&& (compound_depend->type == RECOMMEND ||
compound_depend->type == SUGGEST)
&& (satisfying_pkg->state_want == SW_DEINSTALL
|| satisfying_pkg->state_want == SW_PURGE)) {
opkg_message (conf, OPKG_NOTICE, "%s: ignoring
recommendation for %s at user request\n",
pkg->name, satisfying_pkg->name);
continue;
}
p.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
