Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: > On 20-11-09 15:39, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 20.11.2009, 15:30 +0100 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz: > >> Dnia piątek, 20 listopada 2009 o 15:24:39 Sebastian Spaeth napisał(a): > >> > >>> Better suggestions on how to achieve this are welcome. > >> > >> In distro config: > >> > >> MACHINE_FEATURES_om-gta01 = "this that those butnoapm" > >> > >> This way your distro has what you want and others have what was set in > >> machine > >> config. > > > > Good idea. > > > > For the records though, I would consider it being the machine > > maintainer's call to define the machine config. If he decides that apm > > is very misleading on said machine, perhaps because without taking > > special care about the peripheral devices there will no be proper > > suspend in the first place, then I might be inclined to follow this > > reasoning and leave apm out there... > > If that's the case, it should be at least noted in the commit message > clearly. In this case it was a commit from someone very new to OE and it > didn't include any explanation or SOBs or ACKs.
True. Since according to the MAINTAINERS file I seem to be the maintainer of this machine I think i will reserve my right to change it then. Distros which absolutely want apm on those Openmoko devices can still include it. > Since this is about the machine the is the default in our GettingStarted > wiki, a mail to this list would have been nice as well, if only to > increase the google juice :) Heh, right. :M: _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel