On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:51:52AM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > I'm flabbergasted. > > The link Philip provided suggests this is a bug fix, but Martin does > not find any differences ????
I haven't found any notice about SDL_mixer on that news link (only SDL_image-1.2.9), Refreshed date on sources, can be sort of bug fix even without actuall source change, ie if Makefile don't want to regenerate some file, because its newer than its "source", but haven't checked if that's the case. If someone want's recheck old source and cannot find it, I put it here http://jama.mk.cvut.cz/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz > Also this does not fix the problem that people will have wrong files > in their downloads dir. No idea how to fix this, but for me, if it says I have wrong checksum, first thing I do is remove local file + check if checksums.ini changed (hopefully with some ACK or at least by some respectfull commiter) > Frans (who thingks the package upstream name should have been changed > after making the patch). No doubt about it -- uin:136542059 jid:[email protected] Jansa Martin sip:[email protected] JaMa _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
