On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:24:11AM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/1/25 Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>: > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> > > OK > > > > Acked-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > > Do we want to do this at this point? Or say in a week (or two) after > people got acquainted to the new format.
Understandable, hence my comment in the summary message: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/29487/focus=29560 The second patch removes the old code to generate missing checksums.ini entries - can be applied later, once the switch to the new method is complete and proven. > Btw: I'm not really a script kiddie, but I guess it should not be too > difficult to cook up a script to update the recipes so we can abandon > checksums.ini > (two mechanisms does not seem to be the right way). > Any takers? While it's possible to script, the migration path was defined as to only allow deletion from the central checksums.ini file, while adding new checksums in the corresponding recipes. Still, converting all the entries from the checksums.ini at once would have been a fastest approach. -- Denys _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
