-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08-02-10 14:25, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/2/7 Koen Kooi <[email protected]>: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07-02-10 17:21, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> >>> The last two items discussed were new-style staging and packaged >>> staging. The TSC would like to *strongly* encourage people to move their >>> recipes to new style staging. If you are using packaged-staging with a >>> big TMPDIR (e.g. a few machines with big images built) legacy staging >>> will easily take more than 15 minutes per recipe because it scans >>> through the complete staging looking for changes. >>> >>>> Maybe I missed a thing, but can someone provide a pointer to how a >>>> good recipe with new style staging should look like? >>>> I'll happily modify the recipes I touch regularly, but don't exactly >>>> know what to do. >> >> New-style staging means it has no do_stage method defined anymore (and >> not getting one thru things like autotools_stage.bbclass as well). >> It will re-use the output of do_install() to populate staging and run QA >> checks on. >> >> You can check it building it and and looking for messages like "Legacy >> staging enabled", which would tell you it's still using the old, slow >> method. >> >> regards, >> >> Koen > > Did a quick grep, there are still some 1400+ recipes that have a > do_stage. Now some of them are older versions (e.g. there are 6 > xorg-lib/pixman recipes). > I'm more than happy to do my part of the cleaning but.... > Almost most of the packages are things I don't know too much about. > What I can do (with packaged staging) remove do_stage, build, build a > package that depends on it and if that builds commit my work. Is that > considered to be good enough?
You can compare the contents of the packaged-staging packages to see differences between then. That's what I do as a first check. Building something against it is the second check :) regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFLcBQhMkyGM64RGpERAot+AJ0fcQaGsHWHk107ChvoVnSO2saQ3wCeMZ/O /jHZMEcEaVKXoqMRPa/Jg0U= =V1gH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
