On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:41 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: > Tom Rini wrote: [snip] > > That said, mkimage -A arm is bad. UBOOT_ARCH is right, > > Good point. Total agreement. > > > and comes from kernel-arch.bbclass. So, I > > think a full patch would need to add in changes to image.bbclass to > > inherit kernel-arch so that UBOOT_ARCH will be evaluated. > > > > And yes, this I think should be in bitbake.conf with the rest of the > > image magics > > I've too much respect and to little knowledge to make changes > inside these core components. > > Can someone take me by the hand and guide me. ;-)
It's easy. Just add 'inherit kernel-arch' to image.bbclass, up near the top, test your changes a bit and post :) > PS: And another little question: is '.u-boot' a good extension for > this? Or is the shorter '.u' better? Since the recipe is u-boot (and u-boot-blah-native), .u-boot is fine over .uboot. .u is I think too short / nondescript. -- Tom Rini <tom_r...@mentor.com> Mentor Graphics Corporation _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel