On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 18:49 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 18-03-10 18:29, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 04:37 +0100, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > >> On Thursday 18 March 2010 02:31:11 Douglas Royds wrote: > >>> - Avoids clashing with the machine override when MACHINE=native > >>> - bindir_cross similarly renamed for consistency > >> > >> Thank you for that much work. I think we established the usage of '-' > >> instead > >> of '_' to avoid clashes with the override detection though. > > > > I just noticed this problem. It makes me very very nervous to introduce > > yet another variable naming convention, particularly one we don't use > > anywhere else :/. > > > > Might it be simpler to rename the native machine? Using "native" in the > > override namespace is asking for trouble :(. > > rename it to 'host'?
Its still not a good name to have in overrides. We really need something meaningful but not generic e.g. "localmachine" Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel