On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 11:21 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 12:14 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi, > > > > Currently conflicting headers are both in glibc-dev and > > linux-libc-headers-dev, which isn't a good thing. According to the > > interwebs we should use the linux-libc-headers version. > > > > Anyone opposed to removing the scsi headers from glibc? It would > > basically involve reverting > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=b8bb2a62b3916470c752bd79d31322b4358fc676 > > and > > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=83f41716ab6a2a9d83d4ff044dcef00595ecfeb2 > > So, I did both of those after checking the interwebs and poking some > kernel folks (see comments in > http://bugs.openembedded.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4262 ). The question is, > did the kernel folks change their mind again and we need to either drop > older linux-libc-headers (which I'll just assume is a no-go) or go back > to removing them in new enough linux-libc-headers.
s/in new enough/with new enough/ -- Tom Rini <tom_r...@mentor.com> Mentor Graphics Corporation _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel