В сообщении от Пятница 02 июля 2010 02:01:34 автор Richard Purdie написал: > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 00:14 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > I would like to propose to remove building multilib with gcc recipes. > > It creates problems > > and we do not package correct bits on some platforms. As we tend to > > build toolchains keeping in mind the machine it is targetting I think > > multilib is not that significant > > > > Concerns ? comments? > > I'm backing this. Currently multilib is broken and for a good > implementation we really needs a ground up proposal for how to handle it > well. I'm starting to look into the problem FWIW so I'd appreciate being > in the loop in any discussions.
Please take a look at "rik/amd64" branch. It is outdated, but shows the general approach. We're using it for quite some time. -- http://roman.khimov.ru mailto: [email protected] gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
