On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks <fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like a fine idea to me (although I must say I was unaware of the amend > class, so I cannot really compare). > > An alternative I was thinking of was to have a mechanism in an overlayed > recipe that would allow you to include whatever version was in a lower > priority overlay, but your prososal looks also quite sound.
I have been thinking of this approach several times also. Something like overlay_require pointercal_0.0.bb But I like the bbappend approach also, so +1 from me also. Simple is good :-) /Esben _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
