On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Stefan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> What does not fit your needs with the current stable handling? It started out with a rather continous flow of changed from dev, causing it to be almost as unstable as dev. Now stable/2009 looks mostly dead. What I need is a really _STABLE_ branch, but still maintained, on which it is possible to base products on for customers which do not want to hear about problems with the chosen upstream build system. I realize that I am rather alone with my wishes for stable, so I just rather silently express my wishes here for the record. > I would like to have a more continous flow of changes from dev over some > testing > branch to stable. As indicated in my initial mail. That would people working > on > this idea and keeping it alive though. Given that no one seemed to be > interested > but man seem to be interested to get a new stable/2010 branch the same way we > had for 2009 it seems the most practical way to get one at all, no? > > Other models will only work if enough support from the active contributors is > available. Without this even the best idea might die. Exactly, and this is why I don't really want to push my idea on how a stable branch should work, as I realize I would likely end up being rather alone maintaining it, which is how it is today with my customer OE projects anyways. /Esben -- Esben Haabendal, Senior Software Consultant DoréDevelopment ApS, Ved Stranden 1, 9560 Hadsund, DK-Denmark Phone: +45 51 92 53 93, E-mail: [email protected] WWW: http://www.doredevelopment.dk _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
