2010/8/16 Graeme Gregory <[email protected]>: > On 16/08/10 13:14, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> 2010/8/16 Koen Kooi <[email protected]>: >> would be nice if oe would detect those cases and force a rebuild. >>> That doesn't help if you're using packagemanagement. Now you have >>> "foo_1.0-r0.ipk" in the feeds that statically linked to openssl 0.9.8 >>> and "foo_1.0-r0.ipk" locally that statically links to 1.0.0. So users >>> still don't get the fixes that went into openssl. >> Agree. >> I vaguely recall an idea (I believe from RP) to have a hash or so >> derived from the whole dependency tree below it. >> This discussion probably ran somewhere last winter. >> >> Frans >> > A quick implementation would sum all PR in depends tree above us. > > Graeme >
That would be an elegant and simple solution. There is a minor issue with it wrt lettering (but I guess these can be skipped) and maybe cvs/svn/git numbers (i seem to recall some of these are not monotonic). A more difficult issue is if a dependency is removed. Then suddenly the number will drop. The only solution I see right away is manually add an offset to the recipe to accomodate for this (but it is not really a nice solution). Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
