On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:32 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Can't this me merged into the .26.28 kernel recipe? > > On 19-08-10 01:03, Sean Cross wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <s...@chumby.com> >> --- >> recipes/linux/linux-chumby-falconwing.bb | 14 + >> recipes/linux/linux-chumby-falconwing/defconfig | 1987 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 2001 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 recipes/linux/linux-chumby-falconwing.bb >> create mode 100644 recipes/linux/linux-chumby-falconwing/defconfig
I can do that, but the resulting patch is 28 megabytes. I think that's a bit big. It's Freescale's kernel patch, which supports all of their processors, not just the i.MX233. My guess is that nobody's tried to get these patches into the kernel upstream. The resulting patch I get is mostly an additive patch, as I count 800,000 added lines in the patch, and 1200 removed lines. Which would you prefer? Putting it in 2.6.28, or keeping it as a separate build? _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
