Am Freitag, den 27.08.2010, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > 1. If a patch does not get any review feedback in X weeks time; it is > ok to apply it. People who need more time to review a patch can > mention that in a short reply. In that case they are granted Y more > weeks to review. > (suggestion: X = Y = 2) > 2. If someone NAKs a patch it is obligatory to provide an explanation > why the patch is not good. > Rationale is that > a) people can fix the problem seen by the reviewer > b) people learn from it > c) if there is a disagreement it can be discussed (and if needed > raised to the TSC) > 3) NAKs that are not motivated/explained can be ignored as not given. > > Your feedback, suggestions, additions, amendments, whatever is appreciated.
I agree with that. If someone does the work to create a patch he thinks is worthwhile to apply the least we can do when NAKing is to explain why it is not a good idea. :M: _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel