On 09/12/2010 07:27 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2010/9/12 Koen Kooi<k.k...@student.utwente.nl>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12-09-10 10:34, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Haven't had time to test this yet, but I feel at least a PR bump is
missing (or perhaps a set of PR bumps)
Since it would require a PR bump for everything that is built with gcc,
I'm going to say:
That's what DISTRO_PR is for, which is up to distro maintainers to bump.
Still I feel PR or INC_PR bumps of the affected gcc recipes is
appropriate, if only to fix it for distro's that do not immediately
bump DISTRO_PR.
We have quite some distro's and not all are maintained equally well,
so I can imagine it'll take some time for them to bump
Actually some distro's seem orphaned, so for those it might never
happen and bumping the GCC PR's at least will give them the fix too.
If the DISTRO is not maintained, maybe it should be cleaned up and left
around to confuse people who think it should work well.
Philip
Thinking of it let's see how many distro's actually use DISTRO_PR:
../../conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf:DISTRO_PR = ".6"
../../conf/distro/kaeilos-2010.conf:DISTRO_PR = ".1"
../../conf/distro/kaeilos.conf:DISTRO_PR = ".5"
../../conf/distro/angstrom-2010.x.conf:DISTRO_PR = ".7"
../../conf/distro/shr.conf:DISTRO_PR = ".5"
So that is 5 out of the 32 recipes.
Even one of your own (angstrom-2008.1-legacy.conf) does ot use DISTRO_PR
Very nice to keep the users of those 27 distro's in the cold!
Not.
Frans.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
