On 24 September 2010 05:44, Maupin, Chase <chase.mau...@ti.com> wrote: > All, > > I was digging around in the automake sources and I noticed that there is a > top-level COPYING file that says automake is licensed under GPLv2. However, > in the lib directory there is another COPYING file that says GPLv3. I was > trying to figure out what LICENSE should be set to for automake when the > sources contain both GPLv2 and GPLv3 code. Should it be set to something > like GPLv2/GPLv3? I've read that GPLv2 and GPLv3 are incompatible > (http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses#GPLv3-incompatible_licenses) > so can a recipe even be marked as being both GPLv2 and GPLv3? > > Any input would be appreciated here.
If the GPLv2 has the "or later version" clause and you are combining with GPLv3, then there is no incompatibility as the entire thing is then distributed under the GPLv3. If there is no "or later" clause, then its a problem that needs to be sorted out upstream. -Graham _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
