I got this all setup, and I even got openjdk compiled and working. For anyone who is interested check it out on the wiki http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/TS-7500
Also I posted the machine configurations here http://mirror.lug.udel.edu/pub/lug-udel/projects/ts7500/ Is this the right place to request these be added to the openembedded git tree? On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, R.T. McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > I got this all setup, and I even got openjdk compiled and working. For > anyone who is interested check it out on the wiki > http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/TS-7500 > > Also I posted the machine configurations here > http://mirror.lug.udel.edu/pub/lug-udel/projects/ts7500/ Is this the > right place to request these be added to the openembedded git tree? > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:47 PM, R.T. McGee <[email protected]> wrote: >> I got this all setup, and I even got openjdk compiled and working. For >> anyone who is interested check it out on the wiki >> http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/TS-7500 >> >> Also I posted the machine configurations here >> http://mirror.lug.udel.edu/pub/lug-udel/projects/ts7500/ Is this the >> right place to request these be added to the openembedded git tree? >> >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 7:15 PM, R.T. McGee <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The Faraday FA526 core is used in ARM processors like the Semi STR8132 >>> / Cavium CNS2132 which is in my Technologic Systems TS-7500 board in >>> addition to some NAS boxes out there. From what I have read, it >>> basically resembles a ARM920T but has NO thumb interworking support >>> which makes it not fully EABI compliant ( >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg05856.html >>> ). I have build a few tool chains manually that produce working code >>> using a configuration meant for a OABI style armv4 which makes sense >>> since it uses NO thumb instructions, but I am not sure this is >>> optimal. >>> >>> What is the best way to move forward to setup a OpenEmbedded >>> distro/machine configuration for something like the TS-7500 or a >>> general FA526 configuration? I guess, one option is setup OABI ARMv4 >>> style setup but this was removed from things like angstrom a while >>> ago. Switching to OABI just to get rid of thumb seems a little silly. >>> >>> It would be nice to figure out a way to use EABI ARMv4T toolkit but >>> pass flags like -mapcs-32 -mno-thumb-interwork (just a guess) to GCC >>> to insure no thumb instructions (other weird things are discussed in >>> http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort#Otherscenarios ). The linker >>> option -fix-v4bx looks promising for the linker also. A lot of things >>> are possible solutions, but whats the cleanest way to work it into >>> OpenEmbedded's build system? >>> >>> Any suggestion would be helpful. Thanks. >>> >> > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
