> -----Original Message-----
> From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Frans Meulenbroeks
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 12:41 PM
> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCHv2] recipe licenses: update recipe LICENSE fields
> 
> 2010/10/11 Chase Maupin <chasemaupi...@gmail.com>:
> > * While verifying the licensing for the packages I am building
> >  into my file system I found that for some packages the
> >  LICENSE value set in the recipe was either incorrect or
> >  generic and not detailed enough.  This patch is my attempt
> >  to update the LICENSE fields for these packages to match
> >  the actual versions of the licenses in the sources.
> >
> 
> [...]
> 
> > -LICENSE = "GPLv2"
> > +LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> 
> Doe we want this?
> I think most GPLv2 code carries the clause:
> 
> "This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
> of the License, or (at your option) any later version."
> 
> Yet currently virtually all of these have GPL or GPLv2 as LICENSE

Frans,

My original version of this patch was just changing GPL to GPLv2 for example.  
But I was asked about whether it should be GPLv2+ which I guess is more 
indicative of the "or later" clause.  Does anyone have good guidance here on 
how to denote things that are GPLv2 only for now (like git which Linux has a 
note in the COPYING file about it being GPLv2) and things that are GPLv2 or 
later version?  I'm trying for consistency here but I guess there doesn't seem 
to be a set policy for how the LICENSE field should be set.

> 
> v2+ versions:
> 
> enblend/plotutils_2.6.bb:LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> ffmpeg/ffmpeg_svn.bb:LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> gnome/epiphany_2.30.2.bb:LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> gpe-package/gpe-package_0.4.bb:LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> libftdi/libftdi_0.18.bb:LICENSE = "LGPL GPLv2+linking exception"
> libnfo/libnfo.inc:LICENSE = "LGPLv2+"
> lzo/lzo2_2.03.bb:LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> raw-tools/exiv2_0.20.bb:LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> sysvinit/sysvinit_2.86.bb:LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> udev/udev.inc:LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> udev/udev_151.bb:LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> udev/udev_154.bb:LICENSE = "GPLv2+"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to