On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> wrote: > For me things in this branch work out quite well. 5 out of 6 targets > build; still peeking at #6.
I got a build failure with beagleboard/beagleboard-linuxtag2010-demo-image: http://tinderbox.openembedded.net/builds/96943/ Koen, if you happen to read this, do you know if the following change fixes this? commit c9ac99f13f603d15e9a852916cc4daa4a4d210bc Author: Koen Kooi <[email protected]> Date: Fri Oct 15 10:46:24 2010 +0200 python-pygobject: forcefully disable introspection It will pick up the .pc from the native sysroot and then fail to build since we don't have target introspection libs to link against > But actually reason for mailing was to drop the suggestion from Crofton on > irc. > He suggested testing_2010-xx-yy was confusing to some and that we > perhaps better could use tested_2010-xx-yy > I think he has a good point. Yes, I agree that makes sense. We could even rename the "testing" branch to "tested", which is the semi-stable branch that comes out of this effort. Thanks, Cliff -- ================= http://bec-systems.com _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
