On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:10:15AM +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote: > Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.eric...@gmail.com> [2010-11-06 00:56:00]: > > > Khems addition of gcc 4.5 patch effectivly removed the thumb 'bx' > > instruction from the binaries, but Im getting the exact same issue as before > > (kernel panic at init time). > > Same issue as before? What does it mean? What machine and distro combination > is that? I can build something and test it on my ts72xx, which is armv4t also. >
HP Jornada 720 with flashrom Distro JLime-2010.1.conf arch : Armv4 For the record, armv4 is not the same as armv4t, meaning you can for instance run bx without any issue while I cannot. So saying that gcc 4.5 produces fine binaries for your platform is not the same as that it should work on mine. The issue Im seeing is directly after kernel hands over to sysinit I get a kernel panic "trying to kill init..". The following backtrace is nonspecific and essentially says that it wasnt able to run the first binary (=init). > > Filip zyzniewski had the combination of gcc 4.4.2 + eglibc 2.12 working well > > on his machine, I also know another person with an ARMv4t which used gcc 4.5 > > + eglibc 2.12 without any issues (with same distro file). Therefore I still > > believe its an compiler/thumb issue. Im currently trying to reproduce > > filips environment to make sure, once I do it should be confirmed. > > Sorry, I don't know Filip, nor his machine, can you be please more specific? > :-) Thanks. > He built the combo gcc 4.4.2 + eglibc 2.12 for same machine using same distro file and his works, mine doesnt (i got gcc 4.5). > -- ynezz > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel