On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 02:20:26 +0100 Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > should not.. but now it is, because it's broken by autotools/base/vala > bbclass (in this case is maybe even intentional to remove lvm2 > dependency?).
It is as lvm2-native doesn't exists, it seemed it didn't made sense, (at least for me) to provide parted-native with lvm support. > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-October/026188.html > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-October/026189.html > > Regards, _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
