Op 23 nov 2010, om 16:16 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven:
> On 11/23/2010 07:57 AM, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:40:18AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On 11/23/2010 04:37 AM, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
>>>> I'm trying to build minimal-image with CSL toolchain, but I got this error:
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: package external-toolchain-csl-1.0-r6: task do_install: Started
>>>> ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting
>>>> ERROR: Build of
>>>> /media/DISK/vjaquez-angstrom-setup-scripts/sources/openembedded/recipes/meta/external-toolchain-csl.bb
>>>> do_install failed
>>>> ERROR: Task 187
>>>> (/media/DISK/vjaquez-angstrom-setup-scripts/sources/openembedded/recipes/meta/external-toolchain-csl.bb,
>>>> do_install) failed with 256
>>>> ERROR:
>>>> '/media/DISK/vjaquez-angstrom-setup-scripts/sources/openembedded/recipes/meta/external-toolchain-csl.bb'
>>>> failed
>>>> ERROR: Function do_install failed
>>>> NOTE: Task failed: ('function do_install failed',
>>>> '/media/DISK/vjaquez-angstrom-setup-scripts/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/external-toolchain-csl-1.0-r6/temp/log.do_install.22227')
>>>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
>>>> /media/DISK/vjaquez-angstrom-setup-scripts/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/external-toolchain-csl-1.0-r6/temp/log.do_install.22227
>>>> Log data follows:
>>>> | cp: cannot stat
>>>> `/media/DISK/sgpp/arm-2010q1/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libc/lib/*': No
>>>> such file or directory
>>>> | ERROR: Function do_install failed
>>>> NOTE: package external-toolchain-csl-1.0-r6: task do_install: Failed
>>>> ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting
>>>>
>>>> For some reason the variable ${TARGET_SYS} is evaluated as
>>>> arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi instead of arm-none-linux-gnueabi which is the
>>>> correct value.
>>>
>>> Please post your local.conf settings as well as what version of
>>> openembedded (and what branch) you are using.
>>
>> I'm using the openembedded's branch org.openembedded.dev (HEAD)
> [snip]
>>
>> If I apply this patch[1] the problem seems to be solved.
>>
>> 1.
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org/msg11415.html
>
> I thought the patch had been applied. Koen, do you still object after it was
> explained that currently angstrom is always going to win setting that
> variable unless it's made a ?= ? Thanks!
I still object to that patch, since a different solution has been applied
already. And I still don't see why people want to use known broken toolchains...
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
