> -----Original Message----- > From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Frans Meulenbroeks > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:48 PM > To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; p...@yoctoproject.org > Subject: [oe] libcdaudio license issue > > I was checking libcdaudio for LICENSE info. > recipe says GPL > COPYING file is the GPLv2 one > README file says: > > libcdaudio is distributed under the GNU Library General Public > License, included in this package under the top level source directory > in the file COPYING > > C files also mention LGPL. but say v2 or later > > What to do with this in the LICENSE field? LGPLv2+ ?
Frans, My thought would be to follow what is in the code. Some files can be autogenerated by tools like automake and if someone doesn't set the up right then they get the wrong output. But the code is usually what someone has written and what they intended. Anyone else have a differing opinion? > > Frans > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
