On 12/15/2010 01:45 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 12/15/2010 03:29 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:16:04AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> What are other distributions based on? Pixie dust? >> >> I meant distritubions where end-user normally gets only recipes how to >> build from source >> on his machine instead of installing prebuilt binary packages shipped >> by distribution. >> > I am not sure there is a lot od software that uses the problematic > header :) > > Khem suggested we put the file in include/i2c-tools/i2c-dev.h. This > means programs that need the i2c-tools version can adjust the header > search path with a -I.
I think what Khem suggested was ${include}/i2c-tools/linux/i2c-dev.h, because otherwise programs including <linux/i2c-dev.h> would still pick up the kernel header, even if -I${include}/i2c-tools was prepended to the program's CPPFLAGS. Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel