On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Petr Štetiar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marek Sujak <[email protected]> [2011-01-31 09:43:58]: > > > > Duplicate DP=-1 and you can drop the comment also, it's wrong anyway. > > > > Done. Should be removed in Patch v3. I was unable to git cherry-pick ... > so > > i rather cloned whole repository and make patch again. > > And that's why you've made it wrong again :-) > > Yes, you've sent two patches, but with wrong content. It should be two > patches, > but first one should add generic support for Barebox 2010.10 as Eric > suggested > and the second one should contain support for your vmx25 machine for > Barebox: > > [patch v4] barebox: add recipe for 2010.10 release > [patch v4] barebox: add support for vmx25 machine > > Yes i did that, i forgot to merge machine support patches. And after first commit it was to late for me to fix it. At least "[Patch v3] barebox: added recipe for barebox v 2010.10" should be ok. Just machine support are divided to (1=patches + 2=recipe update) [PATCH v3] barebox: patches for barebox 2010.10 to support vmx25 [PATCH v3] barebox: update barebox 2010.10 to support vmx25 It is partially acceptable or should i rework it again? Thanks Best regards, Marek _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
