On 03/18/2011 02:35 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 21:33 +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2011/3/18 Dr. Michael Lauer<mic...@vanille-media.de>:
Salut,
the blacklisting of packages as found in angstrom.bbclass
is pretty helpful and would be beneficial to all kinds
of distribution configurations in OE. Would there be
a strong objection of renaming this to blacklist.bbclass?
Copying, of course, is also a possibility, but
in my opinion it would only be the second best choice.
Cheers,
:M:
If blacklisting a certain package for all distro's is there then still
a need to keep those blacklisted packages ????
The class that Mickey is talking about is just the mechanism to allow
blacklisting. It doesn't actually contain a list of blacklisted
packages; I think that typically goes in DISTRO.conf for distros that
use it.
However, if we do want to rename it to something more global (which I
agree seems like a good idea) then the contents would need a bit of
tweaking since both the variables that it looks at, and the messages
that it outputs, make reference to Angstrom specifically.
I've had that locally for a long while now (BLACKLIST and just %s is
unsupported because %s). So I vote in favor of a generic list distros
blacklist items class.
--
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
