On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Robert Foerster <rob...@erafx.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Antonio Ospite
> <osp...@studenti.unina.it>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:31:20 -0400
>> Bob Foerster <rob...@erafx.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Bob Foerster <rob...@erafx.com>
>> > ---
>> > ...code-native_2011d.bb => tzcode-native_2011e.bb} | 11 ++++++-----
>> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> > rename recipes/tzcode/{tzcode-native_2011d.bb =>
>> tzcode-native_2011e.bb} (51%)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2011d.bb b/recipes/tzcode/
>> tzcode-native_2011e.bb
>> > similarity index 51%
>> > rename from recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2011d.bb
>> > rename to recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2011e.bb
>> > index 1cc7757..39b172b 100644
>> > --- a/recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2011d.bb
>> > +++ b/recipes/tzcode/tzcode-native_2011e.bb
>> > @@ -6,11 +6,12 @@ require tzcode-native.inc
>> > # Also, tzdata (and it is needed to build tzcode) version can differ
>> from
>> > # tzcode version, thus this variable
>> >
>> > -TZDATA_PV = "2011d"
>> > +TZDATA_PV = "2011e"
>> >
>> > PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
>> >
>> > -SRC_URI[tzcode-2011d.md5sum] = "95095242ee368e6a7e107f154590ac11"
>> > -SRC_URI[tzcode-2011d.sha256sum] =
>> "68f2c07471c5390199c09fe9fee6a22f8a4dac24713af88b92da17b33ad98cc7"
>> > -SRC_URI[tzdata-2011d.md5sum] = "03c5793502b7c41985edd73146bf7e36"
>> > -SRC_URI[tzdata-2011d.sha256sum] =
>> "415a54774094e8dcdc9ba141fafbee4b3b2f2140a5b8cf012eea4b37fb9a23bd"
>> > +SRC_URI[tzcode-2011e.md5sum] = "fbfc05dbf9ebcfe7c4bba18549870173"
>> > +SRC_URI[tzcode-2011e.sha256sum] =
>> "8fb00f8763aa51d83d6f3190d144124bb7176ca829fc08823d6205297bf0426b"
>> > +SRC_URI[tzdata-2011e.md5sum] = "044a07072300a0ee72b046e5a9a4ec90"
>> > +SRC_URI[tzdata-2011e.sha256sum] =
>> "44fef01de4589a4979eb6b5fdbbfd21a3b135852af1ecbfb9e0368ae47392c79"
>> > +
>>
>> Just nitpicking, maybe you can drop the last blank line.
>> Same comment for the other patch about tzdata.
>>
>>
> Sure, v2 sent. Though it seems git send-email didn't prefix the second
> patch with v2. That's odd, because it showed the proper subject when
> sending:
>
> To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] tzdata: update to 2011e
> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:28:26 -0400
>
Nevermind this. It seems gmail coalesced the versions to me, causing my
confusion. They both look fine on the list.
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Antonio
>>
>> --
>> Antonio Ospite
>> http://ao2.it
>>
>> PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001
>>
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
