On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 08:54:53PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 17-04-11 20:21, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:09:48AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > >> On 04/17/2011 12:00 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > >>> On 17-04-11 04:28, Tom Rini wrote: > >>>> On 04/14/2011 12:34 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>>>> Tom, > >>> > >>>>> Please pull these 5 commits for TI related changes - matrix-gui rev > >>>>> bump, > >>>>> new ti-ipc version and sgx/gles fixes for ti816x. > >>>>> All are cherry picked from oe.dev > >>> > >>> > >>>>> Pull URL: git://arago-project.org/git/people/denix/openembedded.git > >>>>> Branch: 2011.03-maintenance > >>>>> Browse: > >>>>> http://arago-project.org/git/people/?p=denix/openembedded.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/2011.03-maintenance > >>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@ti.com> > >>> > >>>> Applied, thanks. > >>> > >>> Tom, can you please unmerge it? The SGX commit is bogus, I have already > >>> asked Denys to revert it from .dev. I do not want crap like that in > >>> maintenance. > >> > >> All of the parts of the merge or just a specific one? > > > > Tom, > > > > Can we hold off with unmerging/reverting for now? I'm trying to understand > > the > > damage level and see the best course of action... But the commit in > > question > > is "ligles-omap3: Remove SGX Fixup for TI816x" > > Right, only the "ligles-omap3: Remove SGX Fixup for TI816x" needs to get > reverted. > > > > > Koen, > > > > I replied to your email. Please let me know if you still prefer the > > complete > > revert or if it can be worked around, as it still works, while may not be > > optimal, and doesn't break anything else. Thanks. > > As I said in my response to the patch: > > - ------ > So, I'm back from travelling now and I'll have to NAK this patch: > > 1) it assumes netra will never have an sgx core update and makes it > diverge from the other platforms. > > 2) it adds a useless 2 second boot delay > > So the net result is a harder to maintain slower version of the scripts, > which is not acceptable. > - ------ > > So I'd very much like to get this patch reverted both from .dev and > 2011.03-maintenance. Especially considering I'm the actual maintainer > for that recipe. > > For fun, try booting on omap3 and moving the SD to netra and see what > happens. This is what we do at the office and customers do as well.
Ok, I'll revert this specific patch from .dev Tom, Please go ahead and unmerge/revert it from the 2011.03-maintenance. Sorry for the inconvenience. Sid, Please resubmit the patch with the above issues fixed. Thanks. -- Denys _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel