On Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:27:53 AM Steffen Sledz wrote: > On 09.08.2011 11:23, Steffen Sledz wrote: > > On 07.08.2011 22:46, Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Steffen Sledz <sl...@dresearch-fe.de> wrote: > >>> Am 05.08.2011 09:13, schrieb Steffen Sledz: > >>>> On 04.08.2011 08:29, Steffen Sledz wrote: > >>>>> In the last days we switched our local development from an older > >>>>> oe-dev master to 2011.03-maintenance branch and hit an annoying > >>>>> problem. > >>>>> > >>>>> The test builds on various developer machines were successful > >>>>> but the build on our continuous integration server (with > >>>>> exactly the same scripting) ended up with a lot of>>>>> > >>>>> | * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following > >>>>> | dependencies for lighttpd: * libstdc++6 (>= 4.3.3) * > >>>>> | libgcc1 (>= 4.3.3) * libgcc1 (>= 4.3.3) * * > >>>>> | opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package lighttpd. > >>>>> > >>>>> errors. > >>>>> > >>>>> After some searching we found that there was no > >>>>> libgcc1_4.3.3-r24.2.6_armv5te.ipk in the deploy area. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm not sure which package should produce this but i guess it > >>>>> should come from gcc-cross-4.3.3 (because its recipe version is > >>>>> r24.2.6 in opposite to gcc-4.3.3 r24.1.6). > >>>>> > >>>>> Looking into the log i hit the fact that the do_rootfs stage for > >>>>> the image was started *before* the do_package_stage of > >>>>> gcc-cross_4.3.3.bb was succeeded. > >>>>> > >>>>> Any ideas? > >>>>> > >>>>> PS: Bitbaking gcc-cross explicitly before bitbaking the image > >>>>> wors as a workaround for us at the moment.>>>> > >>>> I made some research in this and there is something i do not > >>>> understand. > >>>> > >>>> The task-depends.dot generated by bitbake -g (says > >>>> > >>>> "console-image.do_rootfs" [label="console-image > >>>> do_rootfs\n0:1.0-r0\n/home/sledz/work/angstrom-setup-scripts/ > >>>> sources/openembedded/recipes/images/console-image.bb"] > >>>> "console-image.do_rootfs" -> "lzo-native.do_populate_sysroot" > >>>> "console-image.do_rootfs" -> "bluez4.do_populate_sysroot" > >>>> ... > >>>> > >>>> So do_rootfs depends only on do_populate_sysroot stages. But the > >>>> do_rootfs stage itself uses opkg to install the packages into the > >>>> image. > >>>> > >>>> In my understanding this means that all the ipk files need to be > >>>> available. But this is not guaranteed by the reported > >>>> dependencies. > >>>> > >>>> A misunderstanding of mine? Or a bug? > >>> > >>> Ping! > >>> > >>> Did everyone read my message? > >>> > >>> If it really is a misunderstanding of mine, please let me know. But > >>> if i'm right this seems to be a critical problem.>> > >> It sounds both strange and a correct reading of the task lists, iirc. > >> Did we fix this in oe.dev perhaps and just need to pull a change over? > > > > The mentioned dependency problem was a misinterpretation of the > > task-depends.dot.> > > Aside from the do_populate_sysroot there are the following additional dependencies: > > "console-image.do_rootfs" -> > > "console-image.do_package_update_index_ipk" > > ... > > "console-image.do_package_update_index_ipk" -> > > "gcc-cross.do_package_write_ipk" ... > > "gcc-cross.do_package_write_ipk" -> "gcc-cross.do_package" > > > > The problem seems to be located more likely somewhere inside the > > gcc-4.3.3-r24.1/gcc-cross-4.3.3-r24.2 recipes. There seems to be a > > confusion between those which leads to undetermined results. > > > > E.g. the content of > > tmp.6/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross-4.3.3-r24.2/temp/lo > > g.do_package_write_ipk.22477 is: > > ------------------------>snip<------------------------ > > Packaged contents of libstdc++-dev into > > /home/sledz/work/HydraIP/OE/tmp.6/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/libstdc++-de > > v_4.3.3-r24.1.6_armv5te.ipk Packaged contents of libgcc-dev into > > /home/sledz/work/HydraIP/OE/tmp.6/deploy/glibc/ipk/armv5te/libgcc-dev_4 > > .3.3-r24.1.6_armv5te.ipk > > ------------------------>snip<------------------------ > > > > The do_package_write_ipk generates ipk-file with *r24.1.6* (which is the > > PR of gcc) and not *r24.2.6* (which is the PR of gcc). > > > > BTW: Which of the two recipes (gcc/gcc-cross) should provide the libgcc > > ipk (in my case none of it did)?
It should be probided by both. We provide it in gcc-cross so that people dont have to build target gcc just for libgcc. > After some bb recipe updates there is a new error of this type. > > | * check_data_file_clashes: Package libgcc-s-dev wants to install file > | /CACHE/hudson/jobs/HydraIP_Linux_release_image/workspace/OE/tmp.6/roo > | tfs/hydraip-hipox-devimage/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so| > | But that file is already provided by package * libgcc-dev > | > | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package libsqlite3-dev. > : what changes did you do ? libgcc dependencies get encoded into ipks so you might have to regenerate all ipks for best results. I dont know yet what the problem you are seeing could be. I do not see it here locally > :( _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel