On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 23:34 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi: > > Op 02-09-11 21:29, Andreas Müller schreef: > > > On Friday, September 02, 2011 08:48:38 PM Phil Blundell wrote: > > >> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:21 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > >>> Am Freitag, den 02.09.2011, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Richard Purdie: > > >>>> I do find the split useful... > > >>> > > >>> Hmm, could you please elaborate? > > >> > > >> Not that I'm Richard, but I do find the split useful as well. > > >> Personally I am much less interested in the traffic on the oe-devel > > >> list and I often ignore that one; I've been somewhat tempted to just > > >> unsubscribe altogether since there doesn't appear to be all that much > > >> of value (to me) going on there. > > > > > I would even prefer having additional meta-oe list separated from > > > oe-dev. > > > > If there's enough need for it, that can get arranged. > > Why should that be needed? Maybe proposals could be explained and backed > up with arguments for a discussion.
I don't care if it's all in one list or N > 2 separate lists because I'll be subscribed to all and filter will merge all those e-mails to one folder anyways.. But I see your point that it's harder to decide to which list(s) someone should send his question.. Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
