> -----Original Message----- > From: openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-devel-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Frans Meulenbroeks > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 3:07 PM > To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [oe] `PR = "r0"`: Add or not to add? > > 2011/9/1 Philip Balister <phi...@balister.org> > > > On 08/31/2011 06:43 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:30, Koen > Kooi<koen@dominion.thruhere.**net<k...@dominion.thruhere.net>> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Besides, this is also on the policy > >>>> > >>> > >>> The OE classic policy maybe, not on the meta-oe policy[1]. > >>> > >> > >> ETOOMANYPOLICIES > >> > >> so or you change the policy or you follow it. Otherwise makes no > sense to > >>>> have a policy if the person who merge the patches do not follow > it. > >>>> > >>> > >>> - From > http://wiki.openembedded.org/**index.php/Category:Policy<http://wiki.op > enembedded.org/index.php/Category:Policy>I read: > >>> > >>> http://wiki.openembedded.org/**index.php/Commit_Patch_** > >>> > Message_Guidelines<http://wiki.openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Patch_ > Message_Guidelines> > >>> > http://wiki.openembedded.org/**index.php/Commit_Policy<http://wiki.open > embedded.org/index.php/Commit_Policy> > >>> > http://wiki.openembedded.org/**index.php/Commit_log_example<http://wiki > .openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_log_example> > >>> > http://wiki.openembedded.org/**index.php/Styleguide<http://wiki.openemb > edded.org/index.php/Styleguide> > >>> > http://wiki.openembedded.org/**index.php/Versioning_Policy<http://wiki. > openembedded.org/index.php/Versioning_Policy> > >>> > >>> And none of those say PR = r0 is wanted behaviour. OTOH it doesn't > say > >>> it's > >>> unwanted either. > >>> > >> > >> So until it is explicit we might keep PR = r0 as it seems most > people > >> prefer this way. > >> > > > > As long as we are all chiming in, I would like to see all of us > decide once > > and for all what to do. > > > > I also prefer the explicitly setting PR = "r0". Can we work out the > > troublesome cases and see if we can get them fixed? Also, what is the > > oe-core view on this? > > > > Let's work out what the technical answer is and go from there > > > Good plan. > > BTW not sure if it is feasible but ideally a 2nd assingment to a var > should > give an error (or at least a warning). This avoids that e.g. a recipe > and a > .inc file set the var (or that a var is set twice within the same > recipe, in > the past I have seen this). If a variable is intended to be reassigned, > weak > binding should be used. ( ?= or so). > > Frans Hi,
I did not see any thread on oe-core mailing list about this. Did we start this thread there? Noor > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel