I added the functionality for building multiple u-boot binaries to
classic openembedded, but this has not been implemented in oe-core.
I find that rather useful. Anyone disagreeing?

The core of this is:

do_compile () {
    if ! [ "x${UBOOT_MACHINES}" == "x" ] ; then
        for board in ${UBOOT_MACHINES} ; do
            if ! [ `grep ${board}_config Makefile | wc -c` == 0 ] ; then
                mkdir -p binaries/${board}
                oe_runmake O=binaries/${board} distclean
                oe_runmake O=binaries/${board} ${board}_config
                oe_runmake O=binaries/${board} all
            fi
        done
    else
           oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE}
           oe_runmake all
    fi
}

Note that I removed the _config part from UBOOT_MACHINES.

At the moment, the binary after youv'e done
"make beagleboard_config; make" will be called:
u-boot-beagleboard_config-${PV}-${PR}.bin

I think "u-boot-beagleboard-${PV}-${PR}.bin" is nicer.

There aren't that many boards in oe-core at the moment.
Isn't this a good time to get rid of UBOOT_MACHINE altogher
and/or redefine it without the "_config"

P.S: I am working on another project right now, so I don't know
when I have time to test this out on oe-core, so anyone
else interested, feel free to implement it

--
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to