On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:40:28PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Op 18-10-11 18:24, Martin Jansa schreef: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:51:09PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > >> Am Dienstag, den 18.10.2011, 16:10 +0200 schrieb Martin Jansa: > >>> From: pespin <pespin.s...@gmail.com> > >> > >> The name is still not correct. Although the Signed-off-by line is. > >> Please correct that. > > > > Thanks for catching that, fixed in jansa/pull branch. > > > >>> * Copied from oe-classic > >>> <http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/?id=63d3969b0f839fc4b7bf7fe836daec729d9d3c53> > >>> > >>> > * Remove PE=1 > >>> * Add LIC_FILES_CHKSUM * Builds fine using SHR distro * JaMa: removed > >>> PR > >> > >> Was the recipe tested somehow? > > > > Tested on om-gta02 after building it with SHR and added > > RDEPENDS_${PN}-test = "glibc-gconv-utf-16" > > Could you please change that to something like: > > RDEPENDS_${PN}_append_libc-glibc " glibc-gconv-utf-16"
because of eglibc or uclibc? SHR root@gjama ~ $ opkg info eglibc-gconv-utf-16 Provides: glibc-gconv-utf-16 I'm using eglibc and it worked fine, but I haven't tested with uclibc.. But if I add: RDEPENDS_${PN}-test_libc-uclibc = "" then I guess it will fail in runtime like for me without eglibc-gconv-utf-16. Someone with uclibc please test in runtime? I'm aware of: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-August/034467.html but it says nothing about runtime behavior on uclibc.. Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel