On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:33, Paul Menzel < paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 24.11.2011, 09:12 -0200 schrieb Otavio Salvador: > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:23, Hauser, Wolfgang (external) wrote: > > > > > I would vote for an open classic master for bugfixing too, our project > > > based on 2011.03-maintenance goes into the final phase and to switch to > > > oe-core, the budged is not available jet. > > > > I also believe oe-classic master ought to be read-only as soon as > possible; > > I understand that people are using it but the soonner we make it > read-only, > > sooner people will move to oe-core otherwise people will keep starting > new > > project on it and it will never die. > > You seem to use OE-core and meta-oe already so I understand your point > of view. Martin, Koen, Andreas and you are doing the major work for > meta-oe and not a lot of other people contribute. > > In my opinion it is a bad sign to force people to switch. OE-core and > meta-oe should be so appealing that they switch by themselves. My > impression from reading the list and from IRC is that a lot of people > still have objections and are not totally comfortable. Good community > management would be to listen to these people then try to find solutions > and implement them. People then should come by themselves. > In fact I use both. The projects running at oe-classic are working well and will be kept running that way but all new ones are based on oe-core + meta-oe. I am not against oe-classic maintainence branch and people contributting new fixes but I am against the work on new features and recipes being put on master branch. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel