-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 09-10-12 14:04, Martin Ertsaas schreef: > According to http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi/, libftdi > itself is licensed under LGPLv2, with some parts (eeprom programmer) is > licensed under GPLv2. There doesn't seem to be any part licensed under a > GPLv2-REL variation of GPLv2, and so we should use GPLv2 instead of > GPLv2-REL. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Ertsaas <mert...@cisco.com> --- > meta-oe/recipes-support/libftdi/libftdi_0.19.bb | 2 +- 1 files > changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/libftdi/libftdi_0.19.bb > b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libftdi/libftdi_0.19.bb index 2dba3f4..0842aaf > 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/libftdi/libftdi_0.19.bb +++ > b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libftdi/libftdi_0.19.bb @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > including the popular bitbang mode." HOMEPAGE = > "http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi/" SECTION = "libs" > > -LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 GPLv2-RLE" +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 GPLv2" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM= > "file://COPYING.GPL;md5=751419260aa954499f7abaabaa882bbe \ > file://COPYING.LIB;md5=db979804f025cf55aabec7129cb671ed \ "
Since LICENSE ends up in the package: missing PR bump. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFQdDIGMkyGM64RGpERAlaLAKCCNbr1Tcydi+Re/9Wdoc/zKVibKwCgi2bH MOFVynH6iiHafgC1/70Fq/M= =PGD4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel