On 11/30/2012 12:38 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Peter Bigot <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Andreas Müller
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Andreas Müller
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Andreas Müller
<[email protected]> wrote:
gettext 0.18.1 is installed both on the build machine, and as a native
package used when building under bitbake. If it's at all relevant, I
have
LANG=en_US.UTF-8 in the environment in which bitbake is executed.
Did you try a full reversion of 5febf70? Can you tell why, in your
environment, autotools.bbclass replaces the Makefile.in.in for
libgphoto2?
It does not do this for me (otherwise I think Koen's patch that only
reverts
part of 5febf70 would not work).
Peter
It should copy see autotools.bbclass line 195
Andreas
Peter
One stupid question: Are you working with oe-core master - because
commit 841ea3c1c18e50e77fccbd5f44d6a79a50913b67
Author: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Oct 11 08:43:01 2012 +0000
which started my gphoto2 trouble is not found in danny
Yes, seems to be a danny/master inconsistency, resulting from oe-core
branching danny six weeks before meta-openembedded did, with my checkouts
happening between the two points.
So from what I can see now is that meta-oe's
commit 92e3f684d14fd287194e78bc5e65f80504758b7d
Author: Koen Kooi <[email protected]>
Date: Wed Nov 21 14:42:02 2012 +0000
gphoto2: fix gettext build error
Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <[email protected]>
should be merged to danny and reverted (with PRbump) in master.
I think 5febf70 should be reverted (with PR bump) in danny, which is where
I'd started before I noticed 92e3f68 in patchwork.
agreed
In any case 92e3f68 should be discarded since it leaves the removal of
AM_PO_SUBDIRS() from
configure.ac in place with no motivation once the Makefile.in.in is no
longer overwritten.
Isn't that exactly what the patch I sent does?
Probably. Unfortunately I had put my subscription on hold six months
ago and had problems re-enabling it last weekend so I missed seeing your
patch; that's been fixed and my address updated. I also hadn't bothered
to pull recently, so didn't see that Koen's change had been applied.
And so I added to the confusion; sorry about that.
If that seems plausible I'll prepare a patch.
Appreciated - because if would do it would most likely cause further
confusion :)
Actually, it'd probably lessen it, since I'm just a bit player in this
theatre. But I'll give it a go later this afternoon after I make
progress on what I'm supposed to be working on....
Peter
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
