On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > On Friday 26 April 2013 23:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> And do you really need a .inc? >> > >> > Are we removing inc files if they were present in OE Classic? First I've >> > heard if we are... >> >> If we are trying to reduce the number of versions of recipes we carry, >> dropping .inc files would seem to be a good idea. I don't have strong >> feelings, but it seems like something we should consider. > > I agree we should try to keep only one version of each recipe in software > layers, however I figure it makes it easier for people to carry their own > versions of recipes in distro layers (particularly older, which may be > required in certain circumstances) if we do keep inc files where they already > exist.
I put the .inc in this patch, indeed because it was there in OE Classic. I can update the patch if there is a consensus to remove the .inc. also for the INC_PR, I added it, because I thought it makes sense for .bb with .inc to have that. again, i can update the patch if you recommend doing this way. thx _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel