HI Bruce, On Aug 29, 2013, at 10:58 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a vexpress A15 that works here as well, but I wouldn't mind comparing > configs. If you send it along, I'd have a look. Does this mean you've got vexpress-a9 and vexpress-a15, but you've never intentionally published or made these qemu configurations available, so that WindRiver has a commercial advantage when it comes to machine emulation for these machine architectures? I can't but help think of the discussions that we had over the meta-zynq layer, where the meta-zynq layer was not maintained, and WindRiver never released any of the updates to meta-zynq because of some "issues". At that time, you were pushing for linux-yocto and LTSI, and fast forward 1 year or more and the meta-zynq layer is still not updated or maintained, and it's only recently that Xilinx themselves added support to their meta-xilinx layer for linux-yocto. I've also observed that you're the only one maintaining linux-yocto!! So, what I'm trying to get at it, it doesn't really help any one in the open source community if work that's useful for other is withheld for WindRiver gaining a commercial advantage (meta-zynq & xilinx case in point) and (versatile-a9 and versatile-a15) in point, especially when you're the sole maintainer for the linux-yocto kernel, which happened to mentioned qemuarma9 machine support. I mean either you don't publish anything that Wind River chooses to keep proprietary or support the machine configurations defined in the linux-yocto meta branch. Best regards, Elvis Dowson _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel