On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:39:18PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 02:30:05PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > > > Since Dora is a branch of meta-qt5, I don't understand your statements > > > about > > > being orthogonal and not integrated... > > > > > > > You will be able to use *any* meta-qt5 on top of Dora, just as you can use > > meta-qt5 on top of denzil nowadays. The "dora branching" sounds like red > > herring to me. The dependencies in Dora will be good enough for 1-2 years, > > if not much more. > > That's not true, we were just lucky that there weren't any incompatible > changes in oe-core, but as soon as 1.6. brings e.g. new cmake, master > branch will work only with master and dora only with dora (because of > .bbappend). > > So the same branch names are the only supported combination, if you want > to use meta-qt5/master with oe-core/dylan then you're on your own. It > works now, but only because we're lucky.
Yep, well said! -- Denys _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel