Hi all,
i'm the author of the merge-request on github.
The patchset from Denys looks nice. Especially because it cross compiles
the host tools for the SDK_MACHINE which i forgot todo in my patchset.
I think the best way would be a combined version of both patchsets.
Because some of you think my patchset is too complicated i want to
highlight why i added the complicated creation of the qt.conf and the
additional patching of the mkspec files etc.
I didn't tested Denys version but i think it only works if you source
the environment scripts of the SDK before.
As a Qt developer it's the defacto standard to get a SDK which works out
of the box for your projects by just invoking qmake and no need to
source a script before which changes your environment.
To get this done you need to patch the mkspec folder and the qt.conf to
use relative paths instead the hardcoded paths which where created
during the yocto build.
In addition i created a linux-oe-sdk-g++ which contains the real values
of the environment variables but without --sysroot. This will be set by
qt itself by using the CROSS_COMPILE prefix.
I hope you understand that this is really needed if you want to get a
good qt5 integration into a OE SDK.
Best Reagrds
Dominik
P.S. If you want to use the qmake inside qtcreator you would need to set
all the env variable of the environment script inside qtcreator which is
really inconvenient
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
