[Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] strongswan: update verion to 5.1.1] On 14.02.25 (Tue 12:19) Huang, Jie (Jackie) wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] strongswan: update verion to
> > 5.1.1
> > Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:02:22 -0500
> > From: Joe MacDonald <j...@deserted.net>
> > Reply-To: <openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
> > To: <jackie.hu...@windriver.com>
> > CC: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com>, <openembedded-
> > de...@lists.openembedded.org>
> >
> >
> > [Re: [oe] [meta-networking][PATCH] strongswan: update verion to 5.1.1] On
> > 14.01.22 (Wed 12:29)
> > Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:50 AM, jhuang0 <jackie.hu...@windriver.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/20/2014 10:56 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Friday 17 January 2014 14:40:48 jackie.hu...@windriver.com wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * Add rdepends on strongswan-plugins.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Is this really correct? Does strongswan not work without the plugins?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, without the plugins, the ipsec_starter fails to start:
> > > >
> > > > root@qemu0:~# ipsec start
> > > > Starting strongSwan 5.1.1 IPsec [starter]...
> > > > root@qemu0:~# tail /var/log/auth.log -n 4
> > > > 2014-01-21T02:46:57.175940+00:00 qemu0 ipsec_starter[926]: Starting
> > > > strongSwan 5.1.1 IPsec [starter]...
> > > > 2014-01-21T02:46:57.653396+00:00 qemu0 ipsec_starter[935]: charon has
> > > > quit:
> > > > initialization failed
> > > > 2014-01-21T02:46:57.656916+00:00 qemu0 ipsec_starter[935]: charon
> > > > refused to be started
> > > > 2014-01-21T02:46:57.661374+00:00 qemu0 ipsec_starter[935]: ipsec
> > > > starter stopped
> > >
> > > So why to split it?
>
> Sorry for late response since I lost lots of Emails in my broken hard disk.
>
> Actually I didn't know why it was split to plugins, the original version
> 5.0.0 in meta-networking did that,
> I just kept what it was and did some necessary changes in the uprev.
so, a bit of digging turns up that it looks like this was done as part
of addressing a QA issue. That's when FILES_${PN}-plugins appears to
have been introduced. That almost certainly seemed like the cleanest
approach at the time (in the absence of any other information, it's
certainly what I would've done) but knowing that strongswan is
non-functional without the plugins, I think the right thing to do is
remove the split rather than introduce an RDEPENDs.
-J.
>
> Thanks,
> Jackie
>
> >
> > ping
> >
> > --
> > -Joe MacDonald.
> > :wq
> >
> >
>
--
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
