On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Paul Barker <p...@paulbarker.me.uk> wrote: > You've fixed util-linux in a different way to me, I added qsort_r to > musl
this won't fly in musl community. whereas you've removed it's use from util-linux. I'm not bothered > which one we use if both work. We do now have 4 people looking at > util-linux fixes: Me, you and Robert Yang (as util-linux-native > doesn't build on Centos 5.10 due to the same qsort_r usage) here in > oe-core and Karel Zak from upstream (as they want to fix it for their > next release). I think we need to pick one fix (probably yours if it's > tested and working in another distro) and get it applied to oe-core > master. yes, I think not using qsort_r is common solution for all these issues. > > Your latest commit "glibc-2.0: Fix build issues that arise on musl" > should say glib not glibc. Other than that, your glib fix is better > than mine (I did add <string.h> but didn't add the > '--with-libiconv=gnu' option, instead I set musl as the provider of > virtual/libiconv). in order to build a lot of software we would need some sort of iconv implementation letting musl to provide it is probably ok too but I wanted to take the tested path to get to an image to build and then we have a known baseline and we could experiment more. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
