On Wednesday 21 May 2014 12:14:26 Matthieu CRAPET wrote: > I can understand the "maintenance" point of view. I've watched closely to > the build system of the 3 versions, it's quite the same. 9.x adds more > switches than 0.8.x and 10.x adds more switches than 9.x. As libav.inc is > common, it deserves it. I've compiled the 3 versions with multiple > (package)configs, and as far as tested, nothing is broken. Why not dropping > 9.x a and keep 10.x (plus 0.8.x of course)?
The major version bumps are not just about additional switches though. If you look at upstream-tracker.org [1] you can see that there were API/ABI-breaking changes between 9 and 10 (and the libav project's version 10 announcement [2] confirms this). The question is, for what we build in OE that depends upon libav are these changes significant or not? If they are, are corresponding upgrades available that are compatible with libav 10? Cheers, Paul [1] http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libav.html [2] https://libav.org/news.html#10final -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel