On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:20:51PM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > > > Il 23 luglio 2014 13:42:38 Jody Bruchon <j...@jodybruchon.com> ha scritto: > > >On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:> I would like to add my > >support to Thomas' position. > > > Regardless of what happens with glibc and/or musl, an active community > > > supporting regular releases of uClibc is a good thing. > > > Time has spoken that we can't expect this to happen unless something > >changes. > > > >I agree. It is better to have a responsive maintainer releasing periodic > >"stable" versions than to have what is essentially no maintainer and > >sustained long-term fragmentation of what "uClibc" really is. If the > >uClibc maintainer wakes up in the future and begins releasing again, the > >new project's changes can always be merged back to the parent, as they > >did with eglibc and glibc. For now we need to focus on making a stable > >release, something which is grossly overdue and harms all projects > >currently using uClibc. > > > >I also agree that musl is an interesting project with a bright future > >(and a bright present for that matter), but it does not cover all of > >what uClibc covers and the number of projects that already require > >uClibc is too large to simply drop uClibc and move to musl. > > > >-Jody Bruchon > > Gents, > Are we considering anyway that Bernard has recently restarted with patches > review and commit without no contribution from the other co-maintainers > (myself the first) ? > Likely Bernard is already preparing a release !
Yea, but very very slowly, i know. I just started preparing a meta-changelog for the release notes and then we'll call it an official tarball. Lots of changes, about 10% done, approx. 1h left before bedtime. Any prominent changes we should make absolutely sure to mention? -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel