On 14-09-01 11:18 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
Bash scripts:
packages-split/sdparm/usr/bin/sas_disk_blink:#!/bin/bash
packages-split/sdparm/usr/bin/scsi_ch_swp:#!/bin/bash
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.y...@windriver.com>
---
meta-oe/recipes-support/sdparm/sdparm_1.08.bb | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/sdparm/sdparm_1.08.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-support/sdparm/sdparm_1.08.bb
index 713e451..be46b96 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/sdparm/sdparm_1.08.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/sdparm/sdparm_1.08.bb
@@ -15,3 +15,5 @@ SRC_URI[md5sum] = "be5786f37499018ef44f409597c92d42"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
"376b78a414b1a9c47f3f13dbeb963e7a3ec7be126f83927d6856b5f7ac425e57"
inherit autotools
+
+RDEPENDS_${PN} += "bash"
We should move these scripts to a sdparm-scripts sub-pkg.
sdparm is a ~150K executable so making it pull in bash
at >1000K isn't good for embedded systems.
Neither script appears to be essential:
sas_disk_blink - blink the LED on a SAS disk
scsi_ch_swp:
"Usage: scsi_ch_swp [-h] [-s 0|1] [-v] [-w] <blk_device>"
...
"Access the Software Write Protect (SWP) bit in the SCSI control"
"mode page and if changed adjust the Linux block device (e.g."
"/dev/sdc) settings accordingly. If supported, when the SWP bit"
"is set (1) the device is read-only; when clear (0) the device"
"is read-write (i.e. its contents can be read and changed)."
"When no options given it reads SWP and gets blockdev's RO flag."
Comments or concerns?
--
# Randy MacLeod. SMTS, Linux, Wind River
Direct: 613.963.1350
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
