The latest one (V8) seems good to me. I was initially skeptical about
the heavy chromium.inc refactoring, but these days we don't have
multiple chromium versions in meta-browser, so it is okay.
The shared object versioning bandaid wasn't done by me, I modified other
parts, but I agree with the patch. The way it is done now is cleaner.
Have you come across a case where there were codec package conflicts?
Am 2015-04-27 um 23:40 schrieb Otavio Salvador:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Looks like some regressions may have crept back relative previous
versions of the patch?
- dubious indent in do_install()
- .pak files being installed as executables
- dev-so INSANE_SKIP shouldn't be requied
Thanks for bringing it up. I will send a followup to fix it incrementally.
Please wait for Carlos comments and send a new pathc revision. This is
not yet merged so fixes are still possible.
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
