Yes I'm aware of that. What I was pointing out is that usually we have an SPDXLICENSEMAP setting to map e.g. GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0; there is no such mapping for GFDL; I guess the assumption was that there was.
Cheers, Paul On Wednesday 30 September 2015 13:53:08 Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > There is no GFDLv1.1 file in the license directory > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------ openembedded-core/meta/files/common-licenses$ ls GFDL* > > GFDL-1.1 GFDL-1.2 GFDL-1.3 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------ > > It does not make sense to have a duplicate file. > > Incidently, the GFDL-1.1 file contains the GFDL-1.2 license, not the 1.1 > license. > > /Ulf > > Den 2015-09-30 kl. 13:05, skrev Paul Eggleton: > > On Wednesday 30 September 2015 03:10:56 Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Ulf Samuelsson <u...@emagii.com> wrote: > >>> -LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1" > >>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1" > >> > >> IIRC both are correct > > > > I don't think we have an SPDXLICENSEMAP entry for this though, so it won't > > be being mapped (unlike GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0). > > > > Cheers, > > Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
